Justice Brett Kavanaugh went through hell in his nomination to the Supreme Court. Christine Blasey Ford accused him of sexually assaulting her in high school, in which she testified in front of the Senate. Now, her lawyer is saying that pro-choice politics is part of what motivated her to bring forward the allegations against Kavanaugh.
At the University of Baltimore’s 11th annual Feminist Legal Theory Conference, Ford’s lawyer, Debra Katz, made a shocking admission. “In the aftermath of these hearings, I believe that Christine’s testimony brought about more good than harm misogynist Republicans caused by allowing Kavanaugh on the court.”
“He will always have an asterisk next to his name. When he takes a scalpel to Roe v. Wade, we will know who he is, we know his character, and we know what motivates him, and that is important. “It is important that we know, and that is part of what motivated Christine.”
Just like Blasey Ford’s story, her lawyer’s comments contradict previous statements. During her Senate testimony, Christine said, “I am here not because I wanted to be,” Ford said. “I am terrified. I am here because I believe it is my civic duty to tell you what happened to me while Brett Kavanaugh and I were in high school.”
Is bringing forth false accusations to sink a pro-life Supreme Court candidate Ford’s civic duty? These accusations were a middle finger to the pro-life community. Ford’s lawyer Debra Katz is also a longtime Democratic donor who frequently represents those bringing forward sexual assault accusations. It sounds like in her comfort zone, Katz isn’t afraid to spill the beans on the real reason Christine Blasey Ford accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault.
Democrats were going to oppose whoever the Supreme Court nominee was because they weren’t going to be pro-abortion. Just like in 1991 with Justice Clarence Thomas, there was a witch hunt to do everything possible to prevent a conservative justice from reaching the Supreme Court. Katz’s recent comments further destroy the credibility of Ford’s statements.
Since when is being pro-abortion a requirement to become a Supreme Court nominee? Nowhere in the constitution is that required, but if you ask Democrats it is. If you still stand with Brett Kavanaugh and for life, sign up for Americans United for Values today for updates!